Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/SK902.34.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
if(x, y, y) → y
if(if(x, y, z), u, v) → if(x, if(y, u, v), if(z, u, v))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DirectTerminationProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if(true, x, y) → x
if(false, x, y) → y
if(x, y, y) → y
if(if(x, y, z), u, v) → if(x, if(y, u, v), if(z, u, v))

Q is empty.

We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.

Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:

[if₃, u, v]

Status:

true: multiset
v: multiset
if₃: [1,3,2]
u: multiset
false: multiset